Conversation (8)
Sort byNewest


    • 20 JunEdited
      ×
      Delete Post
      Are you sure you want to delete this post?
      Sweet Zeus if that star had any planets, I wonder what was their fate. Flung out at high velocity, shredded and gobbled (and shot out as death rays). If there was any civilization on the planets, they were probably long dead before their planet met it's end. The mind boggles.
      Reply
      Share
      • Nqina Dlamini
        20 Jun
        ×
        Delete Post
        Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        If there were planets, it's highly unlikely that there were civilizations on them. The amount of radiation at the cores of galaxies is so high that it would limit advanced life from forming, if life could form at all in those conditions.
        Reply
        Share
    • 20 Jun
      ×
      Delete Post
      Are you sure you want to delete this post?
      Why do you report the energy output in ergs? Is that a standard in astronomy circles? I would have expected the SI standard joules.
      Reply
      Share
      • Roger Morris
        20 Jun
        ×
        Delete Post
        Are you sure you want to delete this post?
        The paper Phil is discussing here reports most of their results in CGS units. It's a good point, though. In my observation, astronomers seem to be more inclined to use CGS instead of SI, as compared to many other areas of physics. Probably this is due to historical precedent, i.e., habit. Theorists often prefer to use 'natural' units in which the speed of light and Planck's constant are equal to unity. In general, as long as you're clear about your units, nobody seems to mind. Converting among different unit systems is supposed to be a basic skill for physicists, although it doesn't seem to ever be taught in any unified way in any one particular class. I guess mostly it's learned by osmosis.
        Reply
        Share
    Show More Comments...